Scrannr
Head-to-head · UK 2026

Scrannr vs Yuka

Yuka made food scanning mainstream. Scrannr is the UK-made alternative built for British shopping, with free product search and dietary profiles, plain-English additive flags, allergens on every scan, and your data kept on your device. See how the two compare, and where each one comes out ahead.

By the Scrannr team Last updated 20 July 2026

Full disclosure: we make Scrannr, so this is our case for it. Every fact about Yuka is sourced from Yuka's own help pages and independent reviews, and we're clear about where Yuka is ahead.

At a glance

The short version.

  Scrannr Yuka
Made for the UK UK-made, built for UK shopping French/EU origin; European Nutri-Score
Data source Open Food Facts (open, UK-focused) Own database; UK own-label hit-or-miss
Additives Strong additives database, plain-English flags Additive risk flags; one flag caps the score at 49/100
Search & dietary profiles Free Search is Premium-only
Browse supermarkets Yes No
Allergens Surfaced on every scan Dietary alerts are a Premium feature
Scope Food (built for UK grocery) Food + cosmetics
Price Free (5 full scans/mo), then Premium £2.99/mo or £14.99/yr Free core; Premium from £10/yr
Privacy Data on device, no account Independent, but requires an account
Platforms iOS, Android iOS, Android

Made for the UK

Scrannr is built in the UK, for UK shopping. Yuka is French in origin, and while it's officially available here, its scoring engine is the European Nutri-Score, and independent UK reviews report that supermarket own-label lines (Tesco, Sainsbury's, Asda, Morrisons) are hit-or-miss in its database. One app is designed for your shelves; the other works on them.

Data: open and UK-focused

Scrannr runs on Open Food Facts, the open, non-profit "Wikipedia of food" that anyone can inspect or contribute to, with real UK coverage (~190k UK products). Yuka runs on its own proprietary database, which it built in January 2018 after starting on Open Food Facts. Yuka's database is larger globally, but it's closed, and its UK own-label coverage lags. For open data focused on the UK, Scrannr's foundation is the stronger one.

Additives & scoring

Both apps give a 0–100 score. Scrannr has a strong additives database and flags what's worth a second look in plain English, so you get the picture without a blunt penalty deciding it for you. Yuka publishes a transparent formula (60% nutrition, 30% additives, 10% organic). That Nutri-Score basis marks down nutritious whole foods like cheese, nuts and olive oil, though, and a single additive Yuka rates "high-risk" caps a product at 49/100 no matter how little is present, an approach dietitians have criticised. Either way, treat the number as a quick comparison, not a medical judgement.

What's free

With Scrannr, product search and dietary profiles are free, you get five full analyses a month, and nutrition and allergens stay free. Yuka's core scanning is free too, but its search bar is locked behind Premium. The everyday features a UK shopper reaches for most are free on Scrannr and paid on Yuka. When you upgrade, Scrannr Premium is £2.99/month or £14.99/year with a 3-day trial for unlimited analyses; Yuka Premium starts at £10/year.

Privacy

Scrannr keeps your scan history on your device and needs no account. There's no login and no server-side profile of what you've scanned. Yuka is independent and states it doesn't sell user data, a real strength, but it does require an account, and your scan history is stored against it. Both beat ad-funded trackers; Scrannr is the more private of the two by design.

In fairness: what Yuka does that Scrannr doesn't

Two honest points in Yuka's favour. It also scans cosmetics and personal care, which Scrannr doesn't, since we focus on food; if you want one app for your shampoo as well as your snacks, Yuka has the edge. Its global database is also larger, which helps outside the UK. If those matter more to you than UK focus, free search and on-device privacy, Yuka is a reasonable pick.

The verdict

Why Scrannr for UK shoppers.

Why UK shoppers pick Scrannr

  • Made in the UK, built for UK shopping
  • Free product search & dietary profiles (Yuka charges for search)
  • Strong additives database, flagged in plain English
  • Allergens surfaced on every scan
  • Browse supermarkets to compare products
  • Open, UK-focused Open Food Facts data
  • Scan history stays on your device, no account
  • Premium is £2.99/mo or £14.99/yr, with a 3-day trial

Consider Yuka if…

  • You want to scan cosmetics and personal care too
  • You shop mostly outside the UK, where its global database is larger
  • You like its published, formula-based scoring

A note on scores. Yuka's scoring has drawn debate from dietitians: its Nutri-Score basis penalises calorie- and fat-dense whole foods (so olive oil, cheese and nuts can score poorly), and it flags an additive on presence rather than realistic dose. It's still good at surfacing additives, and it won a French court case in 2023 defending consumers' right to information about nitrites. Treat any single score, Scrannr's or Yuka's, as a guide to compare products, not medical or nutritional advice.

FAQ

Scrannr vs Yuka, answered.

Is Scrannr a good Yuka alternative?
For UK shoppers it's our pick. Scrannr is made in the UK, gives free product search and dietary profiles (Yuka charges for search), flags additives in plain English, surfaces allergens on every scan, and keeps your scan history on your device with no account. Yuka's edge is that it also scans cosmetics and has a larger global database.
Does Yuka work in the UK?
Yes, Yuka is officially available in the UK with GBP pricing. But its scoring uses the European Nutri-Score, and UK supermarket own-label products can be hit-or-miss in its database.
Which is more accurate, Scrannr or Yuka?
Neither is a medical authority. Yuka publishes its formula (60% nutrition, 30% additives, 10% organic), but the Nutri-Score basis marks down whole foods like cheese and nuts; Scrannr scores from nutrition and ingredients via Open Food Facts. Both are best used to compare products rather than as a definitive health judgement, and both depend on the underlying label data being correct.
Does Scrannr use the same data as Yuka?
Partly. Scrannr uses Open Food Facts, the open non-profit food database. Yuka started on Open Food Facts too but built its own proprietary database in January 2018, and still contributes some data back to Open Food Facts.
Is Scrannr free like Yuka?
Scrannr is free to use, with five full analyses a month plus free product search, dietary profiles, nutrition and allergens. Premium is £2.99/month or £14.99/year with a 3-day trial for unlimited analyses. Yuka's core scanning is free too, with Premium from £10/year, though Yuka charges for search.
Which is more private, Scrannr or Yuka?
Scrannr keeps your scan history on your device and needs no account. Yuka doesn't sell data and is ad-free, but it does require an account that stores your scan history. On privacy by design, Scrannr is the more private of the two.

See Scrannr for yourself.

Free to start, UK-made, no account needed. Scan your first product and compare.